Misunderestimated

The most entertaining after dinner speaker I’ve ever heard was, to my surprise, the late comedian Bob Monkhouse. While I shared the widely-held view that he seemed a bit smug on television, he was a great comic writer, performer and even a se

rious actor, across many media. In a TV show on Saturday night, a tribute to his life and work, we were told that he once described himself as “a difficult man to ignore, but well worth the effort.”

I rather like that sort of self-deprecating humour, the kind often favoured by the upper classes. The singer James Blunt, a former Army officer and pupil of Harrow School, was once asked how it felt to have been voted the third most annoying person in Britain. He replied “I’m gutted that I didn’t win.” He was also asked if it was true that during the war in Kosovo he’d kept his guitar strapped to the outside of his armoured personnel carrier. “Yes. I wanted to keep it on the inside,” he said “but my superior officers told me I had to keep the men inside.” See here for a funny spoof of one of his videos; he strikes me as someone who would enjoy the joke.

A previous boss of mine, Angus MacDonald, is also an ex-Army officer, what I would call ‘landed Scottish’ and a master of the self-deprecating joke. When he was CEO and owner of Financial News, once a quarter he’d have a talk with all the new employees to introduce himself as the “chap who makes the coffee.” But beneath his modesty was a sharp business brain – he sold the company for about £80m.

What I like about self-effacing humor is that it implies a modicum of humility, confidence and the ability not to take oneself too seriously – it’s the opposite of bragging even if it is false modesty.

It’s easy to underestimate modest people, and I love it when an underestimated person wins the day. Four years ago in Costa Rica, a tour group of elderly American tourists from a cruise ship was held up by three armed muggers. The thieves thought these old people were easy prey until one of the old men got hold of a mugger in a headlock and broke his neck, killing him, prompting the other two bandits to run away. The old man was a former marine. (I wrote a film script based on that story which got some interest from Eon Productions, the makers of the James Bond films, but that’s another story).

I like to be underestimated (rather than ‘misunderestimated’ as Dubya called it), and in work I prefer to under-promise and over-deliver rather than the opposite. As a freelancer, the problem with under-promising is that sometimes you don’t win the work in the first place because it often goes to the best salesman rather than the most honest.

Wealthy people can be modest more easily than the rest of us: you don’t need to blow your own trumpet when you own an orchestra.

P.S.

My last blog about 11:11 and guardian angels attracted about four times the traffic I usually get. Before that, ‘Nemo sex change shock’ was the most popular and still regularly gets hits from Google searches – goodness knows what they are hoping to find. 11:11 also prompted a lively debate on my Facebook page, started by my step-mother Rosemary who pointed out that if you add the year of your birth to the age you will be on your birthday in 2011, it always adds up to 111. Example:

If you were born in 1970 and will be 41 this year: 70 + 41 = 111.

Someone even sent me the mathematical equation to prove it.

Posted in Life, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

My Guardian Angel Wants a Word

On 1-1-11 I blogged that I’ve been a little obsessed by that number pattern, seeming to see 11:11 on digital clocks very regularly since my teenage years and vaguely wondering what might happen to me on 11-11-11 this year. Yesterday evening m

y wife was watching the hospital soap Holby City, and for the first time ever I watched some of it. One of the characters made all her decisions based on signs sent by her guardian angel, including not going for vital surgery because it wasn’t one o’clock. She seemed to be a member of some sort of movement called ’11:11 Light Guardians’. Surely it must be a sign; the first time I see the show it has an 11:11 message. But a sign of what?

Today I typed ’11:11 Light Angels’ into Google and got 1.3 million results. There are 131 videos in Google Videos on the subject.

Imagine my surprise to discover that, apparently, if you see the numbers 11:11 regularly it’s because angels want to communicate with you. There are, conveniently, 1,111 spirit guardians, and they asked for 11:11 to be their sign when we developed digital clocks.

One site, Angel of Light Center has a message from Mary “The Magdalene” about January 11th, 2011 (1-11-11 in American). I guess Mary doesn’t have internet access because her message is “channelled” by Anna Beatrice.

At Universal Life Tools they reckon that 2009 was a rare 11 Universal vibration year (2+0+0+9 = 11). “Thus the 11 Universal vibration year will bring about a planetary rLOVEution of grand proportions and connect EARTH back to the HEART (just move the H from the end to the beginning) of LOVE (Live, One, Vibrational, Energy).” Is it me, or are they taking these patterns a little too far – they’ve even dragged poor old words into it?

Now, I’m probably above-averagely open to things that many people (if not angels) would consider alternative, even whacko. I meditate, do yoga and have been to many sessions at the eRejuvenation center in London where they specialise in channelling positive energy, all of which I’ve found beneficial. Out of curiosity I once even spent a weekend on a course run by Psychic Sue which was interesting (although I wasn’t sure about her claim that she could “read” bare buttocks). But, comforting as it is to think I might have a guardian angel, even I can’t stretch to thinking that he/she is communicating with me through the digital clock of my Ford Fiesta.

I thought it was only me that had this interest in 11:11; it’s even, coincidentally, the date of my wedding. So it’s with some disappointment that I learn that 75m other people also notice this number pattern. Perhaps I’m not so special; it’s just that, as I suspected, 11:11 is a noticeable number. On the other hand, maybe Holby did contain a message from my guardian angel: “Go forth and write a blog about this.”

If you’ve got nothing better to do than watch that episode of Holby City (but I’m sure you have) you can see it here, preferably at 11:11 p.m.

Posted in Life | Leave a comment

Writer Jokes

The Queen was touring a Scottish hospital. She approached the bed of a patient who shouted out “Fair fa’ your honest, sonsie face, Great chieftain o’ the pudding-race!”. Another patient staggered up to her and sang “Should auld acquaintance be forgo

t.” Turning to a doctor she asked if she was in a ward for mental patients. “No ma’am,” was the reply “This is the Burns Unit”.

Groan. But my excuse is that tonight is Burns night. For those indulging in haggis and whiskey this evening, cheers!

Here are a few other writer jokes, for which I have no excuses:

Shakespeare wasn’t allowed into his local pub. He was Bard.

****************************************************

How many mystery writers does it take to change a lightbulb? Two – one to do most of the turning and the other to give it a final twist at the end.

****************************************************

A screenwriter comes home to a burned down house. His sobbing and slightly-charred wife is standing outside. “What happened, honey?” the man asks.

“Oh, John, it was terrible,” she weeps. “I was cooking, the phone rang. It was your agent. Because I was on the phone, I didn’t notice the cooker was on fire. It went up in seconds. Everything is gone. I nearly didn’t make it out of the house. Poor Moggie is…”

“Wait, wait. Back up a minute,” the man says. “My agent called?”

****************************************************

Have you heard about the two literary agents who saw one of their writers on the other side of the street? One of them said “There’s the bastard who gets 75% of our earnings”.

****************************************************

A linguistics professor was lecturing to his English class one day. “In English,” he said, “a double negative forms a positive. In some languages, though, such as Russian, a double negative is still a negative. However, there is no language wherein a double positive can form a negative.”

A voice from the back of the room piped up, “Yeah, right.”

****************************************************

Posted in Fun | Leave a comment

Top 20 Tongue-in-Hand Writing Tips

Here are some not-too-serious writing tips:

1. One-word sentences? Eliminate.

2. One should never generalize.

3. The passive voice is to be avoided.

4. Who needs rhetorical questions?

5. Never use a long word when a diminutive

one will do.

6. Eschew ampersands & abbreviations, etc.

7. Remember to never split an infinitive.

8. Foreign words and phrases are not apropos.

9. Eliminate quotations. As Ralph Waldo Emerson said, “I hate quotations. Tell me what you know.”

10. Comparisons are as bad as clichés.

11. Avoid alliteration. Always.

12. Be more or less specific.

13. A writer must not shift your point of view.

14. Exaggeration is a billion times worse than understatement.

15. Do not put statements in the negative form.

16. Proofread carefully to see if you words out.

17. Don’t overuse exclamation marks!!

18. If any word is improper at the end of a sentence, a linking verb is.

19. Take the bull by the scruff of the neck and don’t mix metaphors.

20. Last but not least, avoid clichés like the plague; they’re so last year.

One definition of a cliché is ‘ A word or expression that has lost much of its force through overexposure.’ The first person to write a cliché is a genius, but the next person to use it lacks imagination. My friend Ruth Brandt wrote the piece below as a light-hearted exercise for students in her adult creative writing class. She says there are 52 clichés in it. How many can you find?

At the end of the day

It was a dark and stormy night when my old man hit the town.  He had had a bit of a wake up call earlier in the week, when the doctor had read him the riot act after telling him his blood pressure was sky high, and he had declared himself to be on the wagon. You could have knocked me down with a feather because for two whole days he had stuck to his resolution, sitting like a couch potato in front of the goggle box and not a drop of the good stuff passing his lips. I was over the moon. Mind you, it was as if he’d got up on the wrong side of the bed; I had to watch my tongue. I could be barking up the wrong tree but as much as missing the booze I think he was bored to tears not being down the pub with his mates.

The final straw came the evening he couldn’t find his glasses even though he searched high and low, crashing round the house like a bull in a china shop. No TV watching for him; he’s blind as a bat without them. Having left no stone unturned, he threw in the towel and came clean, admitting he must have left them at work.

“I’m going down the pub,” he declared.

I had to think on my feet. It struck me that I was stuck between the devil and the deep blue sea; if I let him go he’d be back on the beer and his blood pressure could go stratospheric, and if he stayed he’d be like a bear with a sore head. Eventually I made up my mind.

“You should listen to what the doctor told you,” I said.

But he knew better, true to form he retorted:

“That advice is old hat. Bill has a list of aches and pains as long as your arm and he says that laughter is the best medicine when combined with a jar or two with mates.”

By this stage I was worried sick about him getting in his cups, but even though it was raining cats and dogs he turned on his heel and went. As a matter of fact, he was so set in his tracks he wouldn’t have stopped for all the tea in china.

After forever and a day he rolled in looking like something the cat dragged in.

“Sorry,” he murmured; he knew he didn’t really have a leg to stand on.

I turned in, leaving him catching forty winks on the sofa, because when all’s said and done, the long and the short of it is that it’s best if you don’t mention the war.

Now that I’ve drawn your attention to clichés, you’ll probably spot them everywhere which may, er, get your goat.

Posted in Words | Leave a comment

Maybe Dukan, Not Sure if I Can

After a friend lost loads of weight on the Dukan Diet, my wife asked for the recipe book for Christmas. She hasn’t read it yet, but I have. Dr Dukan is French and his diet is based on eating only protein for a few days, followed by a period of

protein and vegetables. Apparently this is how French women eat, which explains why they’re all so slim. So it’s similar to the Atkins Diet but with low fat proteins. I’ve tried Atkins but I didn’t lose any weight and it gave me gout. I’ve lost a couple of pounds in 10 days with Dr Dukan but apparently I should have lost about seven. Perhaps the fact that I’ve customised it a little by adding chocolate and cashew nuts has reduced its effect.

I’ve never been described as fat, at least not to my face, mainly because I’m usually trying some sort of diet fad. The Carol Vorderman diet book involved a vegetarian detox – lots of salads, oats and pulses. I put on weight. The worst diet was the one recommended to me by an Indian ayurvedic doctor. For three days I had to drink cups of ghee (a sort of butter) diluted in hot water. I had to time it such that on the third day I could remain near a toilet because everything would come sliding out, well oiled. I didn’t lose any weight and drinking the ghee made me gag.

The only diet that has worked for me is the Sacred Heart Memorial Hospital Diet; I was told they used it for heart patients who needed to lose weight quickly before surgery, but apparently that’s an urban myth and hospitals deny using it. This diet involves making copious quantities of vegetable soup and drinking as much of it as you can – the more soup you can force down, the more weight you lose. On Day 1 you can also eat some fruit (except bananas), on Day 2 some vegetables and on day 4 you can go really wild and have a banana. Apparently in the first week you can lose 10 -17 lbs but I’ve never been able to keep it going for more than about three consecutive days without feeling too weak and wobbly to continue (it’s probably not the safest of diets). But over the course of a couple of years I drank the soup often and lost about 20 lbs to the point that people said I looked too thin and I had precious few muscles left. I reached the point where I couldn’t face another mouthful of that insipid soup so over the following seven years I’ve put all the blubber back on, and more (sadly, the muscles are another story). Being a sedentary writer doesn’t help. Wanting to lose it again is partly the desire to stay fit for sport, partly because my cholesterol is too high, partly because I don’t want to buy new clothes but mainly because I’m vain – man boobs are not a good look.

I’ve also tried various diet supplements sold on the internet, but they don’t seem to work either and most contain things I don’t want to consume, like caffeine. I’m not sure I can stick with the Dukan Diet but I’ll keep trying. Who knows, I may end up looking like a French woman (I already have the breasts).

Posted in Books | Leave a comment

Are You An Arithmodigmaphile?

Happy New Year! Today is 1/1/11; my friend Devesh pointed out that in ten days it will be 11/1/11, in ten months it will be 1/11/11 and ten days after that, my 22nd (11 + 11) wedding anniversary, it will be 11/11/11.

I’ve long had a fas

cination with the combination of numbers 11:11. As a teenager whenever I looked at my digital alarm clock, either just before nodding off, or, er, just after waking up at weekends, it seemed that the red numbers always glowed 11:11. And no, it hadn’t stopped. Ever since, when I look at a digital clock, on the car dashboard for example, it often seems to be 11:11. I’m not sure if it’s because that pattern of numbers catches my eye, or because I’m now looking for that pattern I tend to see it and forget all the times that the time isn’t 11:11. Or whether it’s some deep, cosmic message. I didn’t deliberately choose 11/11 as a wedding day because of this, (I like to joke that I did it because it’s Remembrance Day and so I’d never forget my anniversary – people in Britain kindly wear poppies to remind me) but with hindsight it’s a curious coincidence. I wonder what 11/11/11 will hold for me.

Two other pals of mine, Walt Hopkins and George Simons, have invented a word for this kind of thing – ‘arithmodigmaphilia’ which combines the Greek words for ‘number’, ‘pattern’ and ‘love of’. Each year, when the day, month and year are equal, Walt sends out an arithmodigmaphilia email. On 09/09/09 he pointed out that it sounded like “Oh nein, oh nein, oh nein”. In 10/10/10 he started by telling us that, apparently, “ten, ten, ten” sounds like “yes, yes, yes” in Chinese. Walt is a management guru and all round sage – check out the arithmodigmaphilia section of his website:

http://www.walthopkins.com/connections/arithmodigmaphilia.aspx.

Are you an arithmodigmaphile? Tell me what number patterns you like?

I hope 2011 is a good one for you. I’m optimistic.

Posted in Words | Leave a comment

Countdown Conundrums

Now, I wouldn’t want you think I watch a lot of daytime TV, but one of the pleasures of working from home is that I can spend my afternoon tea break watching Countdown. I justify it because it’s a word and numbers game – it’s almost, um, profes

sional development. For any Brits that have lived in a cave for the last 28 years, and for those of you who live abroad and don’t know about Countdown, each weekday two contestants compete to win a teapot and some other junk. Some of them are very clever indeed.

In the word rounds, they take it in turns to select nine letters, blind, only being able to specify the mix of vowels and consonants. They then both have thirty seconds to create the longest word they can from the chosen letters. It’s a bit like Scrabble except the letters don’t have different values. So it’s a game requiring a great vocabulary, which would take many years to acquire, right? Nope. The winner on Friday, and the number two seed for the entire series because he won eight shows in a row with an average score of 112, is just 14 years old. How can someone as young as Eoin Monaghan know words like ‘viragoes’, ‘prentice’, ‘censure’, ‘imamate’ and ‘rainouts’? In one round Eoin used all nine letters with ‘totalised’. I find it hard enough just to spell his name.

The very end of the show is called the Countdown Conundrum where the contestants race to solve a one word, nine-letter, anagram. The letters on Friday were:

H-A-V-E-F-O-C-U-S

He solved it in one second. Answers on a postcard.

He also scored maximum points on the numbers rounds. Here, they take it in turns to choose six numbers, only able to specify how many ‘large’ numbers (25, 50, 75 or 100) and now many ‘small’ (1 – 10) numbers are chosen. A target number is then randomly generated by a computer and they have thirty seconds using adding, subtracting, dividing and/or multiplying the numbers to get as close to the target as possible. Each number may only be used once and the contestant who’s closest to the target number gets the points. If they can’t solve it, the resident human calculator, Rachel Riley, shows how to do it, if it is indeed possible. Rachel is a maths graduate from Oxford University and is even more attractive than her predecessor (and I never thought I’d say that), the ubiquitous Carol Vorderman who worked on the show for 26 years. (It was the first programme to be screened on Channel 4 when it launched in 1982). Here’s a problem the lovely Rachel solved in under thirty seconds last week:

7-9-25-50-75-100

Target number 299.

Getting 298 or 300 isn’t too hard. But a prize to anyone who can show how Rachel got 299 (and huge respect if you can do it quicker than she did).

To see Eoin in action in Friday’s programme click here: http://www.channel4.com/programmes/countdown/4od#3143298

The series final is this Friday (Dec 17th) at 3.25 p.m but, if you can’t work from home like me, you can watch it later on Channel 4′s on demand service at http://www.channel4.com/programmes/4od. My guess is Eoin will be in the final against Cambridge student Jack Hurst, who is the grand old age of 18. Older people do take part on the show, they just don’t seem to do so well. I won’t be applying.

Posted in Uncategorized, Words | Leave a comment

I’ve Been Had

In my previous blog I wrote a sentence with the word “and” five times consecutively. That prompted friend Clive to trump me significantly by challenging me to come up with a sentence that has the same word 11 times in a row.  It’s a puzzle

which comes courtesy of his father, who was an English teacher. My ‘five-anded sentence’ was told to me by my grandfather. It’s nice that these things are being passed from generation to generation; who needs to inherit money? Want to know Clive’s Dad’s unusual sentence?

Brian, where Susan had had “had”, had had “had had”; “had had” had had the teacher’s approval.

If you didn’t have to read that a few times to make sense of it, you’re sharper than I am. Clive also challenged me to come up with four different words that sound the same. Unlike the 11 word challenge, which I failed dismally, I did at least come up with a few possible answers:

Write, right, rite, wright.

Air, heir, ayre, ere

Do, dew, jew, due

Now, I’ll concede that the third one is a bit of a cheat because they aren’t pronounced exactly the same. But I was rather pleased with myself for coming up with the others. Clive then moved the goalposts by telling me a rule that he hadn’t mentioned; that the words must be in current usage. He reckoned ayre and rite are not (apart from ‘rite of passage’). He obviously hasn’t played ayre on a G-string lately.

A prize for the first person who works out Clive’s conumdrum.  Clue: the longest word is three letters.

Posted in Words | 2 Comments

A Five-Anded Sentence

My grandfather used to tell a story which included the word ‘and’ five times consecutively in one sentence. Have a think about that – it’s not easy – I’ll tell you the story in a moment.

This week I mentioned to a friend, Stuart, that I was

60k words into the first draft of my novel, with about 40k to go, and he suggested I use short words to help speed up the process. His top tip was to use the words “and then”, as often as I could. Of course his suggestion was meant in jest but there’s some truth in what he says, at least for business writing; why use a long word when a short one will get the point across more quickly? But in other forms of writing it can be nice to be more sesquipedalian sometimes, encouraging readers to perhaps even reach for a dictionary occasionally.

My grandfather was, literally, a rocket scientist, and later a nuclear scientist, so I suppose it’s not surprising that his many stories were often rather clever. Anyway, here is his ‘five-ander’ story: The owner of the PIG AND WHISTLE pub needed a new sign painting. But when the sign-writer had finished, the pub owner wasn’t completely satisfied with the job, particularly the spacing of the letters. He said “There’s too big a gap between the words PIG and AND and AND and WHISTLE.”

Given my day job these days I’m tempted to edit that sentence to make it clearer, which perhaps makes me a little less useful than Grandpa was. But trust me, you’d much rather have me messing with sentences than with nuclear fusion at a power plant. Or is it fission? See.

Posted in Words | Leave a comment

Heard the One About the Actress?

There’s an old joke about an actress who goes to Hollywood and is so desperate to land a part in a particular movie that she’ll sleep with anyone who can help her get one. But she’s so dumb, she sleeps with the screenwriter. Movie screenwr

iters have similar status to the scum at the bottom of a Beverley Hills swimming pool, unless you’re JK Rowling who, according to the Sunday Times Magazine last weekend, is worth £519m, compared to the mere £42m that Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter) is worth. If that desperate actress had been a little smarter she’d have slept with JK, who wrote the screenplays for the Harry Potter films, right? Nope. Those, with the exception of The Order of the Phoenix, were adaptations of the books done by Steve Kloves. Who?

I bet you can’t name five movie screenwriters (and I’m only going as high as five because I know how well-informed and intelligent the readers of my blog are!). I reckon the average person on the street couldn’t name two (not counting those who are also famous actors, like Emma Thompson, Sylvester Stallone and Matt Damon). But they could name hundreds of actors and probably a few directors. It’s odd, in a way, because a movie usually needs a script, and a script is unique to a particular writer, whereas any number of actors or directors could bring it to life (in their own unique ways of course). The truth is, although one writer probably wrote the original script, once the option has been bought, other writers are usually brought in to polish it. Sometimes the person who wrote the original script doesn’t even get their name on the credits.

TV writers get a bit more credit – you’ll have a slightly better chance of naming more than five TV writers, whereas you’d probably struggle to single out many TV directors or producers. But again it’s the actors that most people associate with a particular show. Novelists who are fortunate enough to find a publisher are much easier to name than screenwriters; they generally get the limelight they deserve because there aren’t as many people involved who can steal it. So, in mathematical terms, the credit a writer gets is inversely proportional to the number of people involved in the final product (especially if some of those people are good looking and charming like George Clooney and Julia Roberts). Going back to JK Rowling, her novels are what made her successful; if she’d pitched Harry Potter as a movie script in the first place we’d probably never have heard of her and she’d still be struggling to pay for the coffee she drank while writing in an Edinburgh cafe.

Given how poorly writers are valued (my daughter says she’s embarrassed to say that her Dad is a writer), it’s ironic that probably the only profession that, on average, pays worse than writing is……acting. Given these insights, I’m writing a novel which I’m then going to adapt as a film. I must get back to it now – I’m thinking of giving my main character a wand and special powers. Failing that, I’ll try to sleep with JK Rowling.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

site tracking with Asynchronous Google Analytics plugin for Multisite by WordPress Expert at Web Design Jakarta.